Anaphylaxis to oral misoprostol in a term pregnant patient who is non-allergic to vaginal misoprostol-a case report

نویسندگان

چکیده

Misoprostol (PGE1) is a drug that very commonly used in obstetrics for labour induction. Apart from its side effect of causing congenital malformations offspring users who have unsuccessfully it as an abortifacient, considered safe with few effects. We here report severe hypersensitivity reaction to misoprostol 33-year-old term pregnant patient non-allergic vaginal misoprostol. The developed anaphylactic features like swelling lips, low voice due laryngeal oedema, and bradycardia. Prompt administration adrenaline emergent caesarean section allowed the delivery neonate. When inducing labour, quick identification treatment anaphylaxis reactions are necessary prevent maternal neonatal morbidity mortality.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study

We want to compare the efficacy and safety of vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor. This randomized clinical trial was performed on 140 women with medical or obstetric indications for labor induction. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: vaginal and sublingual administration of misoprostol. In first group, 25 µg misoprostol was placed...

متن کامل

Comparison of vaginal misoprostol and oral misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone gel for labor induction at term

METHOD(S) : In our tertiary referral hospital, 25 mg vaginal misoprostol 6 hourly for a maximum of five doses and 50 μg oral misoprostol 6 hourly for a maximum of five doses were compared with 0.5mg intracervical dinoprostone gel 12 hourly for a maximum of three doses for induction of labor at term in 150 women in three groups of 50 each. Number of vaginal deliveries achieved, induction to vagi...

متن کامل

Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study

We want to compare the efficacy and safety of vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor. This randomized clinical trial was performed on 140 women with medical or obstetric indications for labor induction. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: vaginal and sublingual administration of misoprostol. In first group, 25 µg misoprostol was placed...

متن کامل

Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.

OBJECTIVE To compare the safety and effectiveness of vaginal with oral misoprostol for induction of labor. METHODS A total of 107 women with clinical indication for induction were randomly assigned to receive oral or vaginal misoprostol. Doses of 100 microg of oral or 25 microg of vaginal misoprostol were given every 3-4 hours. If cervical ripening or active labor did not occur, repeated dose...

متن کامل

Induction of labour with titrated oral misoprostol suspension. A comparative study with vaginal misoprostol.

OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of titrated orally and vaginally administered misoprostol for induction of labour. STUDY DESIGN Unmasked randomized controlled trial. SETTING Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University of Zimbabwe, Harare. SUBJECTS Pregnant women with singleton foetus in cephalic presentation booked for induction of labour, were randomized to receive titrate...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2279-0780', '2319-2003']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20232576